Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1201

reference
478-tree-1
name
1201
tree-preservation-order

undefined

478-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023902 50.884128)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023831 50.884121,-1.023834 50.884135,-1.023844 50.884147,-1.023859 50.884157,-1.023879 50.884164,-1.023901 50.884166,-1.023923 50.884164,-1.023943 50.884158,-1.023959 50.884148,-1.023969 50.884136,-1.023973 50.884122,-1.023970 50.884108,-1.023960 50.884095,-1.023944 50.884085,-1.023925 50.884079,-1.023903 50.884076,-1.023881 50.884078,-1.023861 50.884085,-1.023845 50.884094,-1.023834 50.884107,-1.023831 50.884121)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL